<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Natalie Portman and Johnny Depp Can Save the World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comops.org/journal/2010/03/02/how-natalie-portman-and-johnny-depp-can-save-the-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comops.org/journal/2010/03/02/how-natalie-portman-and-johnny-depp-can-save-the-world/</link>
	<description>A Journal of the Consortium for Strategic Communication</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 16:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Garland</title>
		<link>http://comops.org/journal/2010/03/02/how-natalie-portman-and-johnny-depp-can-save-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Garland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comops.org/journal/?p=1932#comment-384</guid>
		<description>You start by discussing what essentially is a bottom-up, non-policy phenomenon by American celebrities aimed at American and to a degree, Western European, audiences (in part for self-promotional purposes), then end by proposing a top-down, government solution aimed at the &quot;Muslim&quot; world.  American audiences don&#039;t particularly care if a celebrity is working hand in glove with Uncle Sam, but would non-Americans care, especially in the Middle East? I would argue that whatever influence celebrities have outside America flows in part from the fact that they are perceived as independent of Uncle Sam&#039;s tentacles.  And that operating independently of Uncle Sam, sometimes against his policies, is a pretty powerful message to send about a vibrant, open democracy that can broadcast its societal contradictions as loudly it does its partisan shouting sprees.  Think that would fit into a DOD or DOS short-term influence peddling strategy?  

Careful with your &quot;Muslim&quot; stereotyping.  Public opinion polling in predominantly Muslim states in Africa have consistently demonstrated high favorability towards the U.S.  Muslim Senegal and Mali have among the top ten pro-American populations in the world, according to Pew.  Why is this?  Or is it easier to just to ignore them in talking about the &quot;Muslim&quot; world as a monolith?  It could be that there are other factors at play than religion.  It could be, too,  that two of the most influential American &quot;celebrities&quot; to hit West Africa in the last 50 years were Muslim, black, and had faced the wrath of Uncle Sam: Muhammed Ali and Malcolm X.  It turns out that the actors who played the Hollywood versions of their stories, Denzell Washington and Will Smith, are far more popular among Africans that out any of the American celebs who make causes of Africa.   

The American cultural ambassadors program of yesteryear had its bright spots, such as in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union where such celebrities as the New York Philharmonic impacted because of a shared culture.  There were also plenty of dark spots that weren&#039;t often reflected in the USIA reporting of the era.  Take a look at Penny Von Eschen&#039;s Satchmo Blows Up the World to read a complex and critical history of the Jazz Ambassadors, notably in Africa.

It&#039;s an easy answer to say Uncle Sam must always do something.  Sometimes, though, it&#039;s the better half of wisdom not to do anything, and perhaps let our democratic culture -- non-state actors --  do what they do democratically.  Muhammed Ali, silent though his voice is literally now, might have something to say about this, and believe me, if he does, that dadgum draft-dodging you-know-what will get a bigger audience that will pay closer attention out there in the Middle East and Africa than anything Washington might gear up in the name of national security.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You start by discussing what essentially is a bottom-up, non-policy phenomenon by American celebrities aimed at American and to a degree, Western European, audiences (in part for self-promotional purposes), then end by proposing a top-down, government solution aimed at the &#8220;Muslim&#8221; world.  American audiences don&#8217;t particularly care if a celebrity is working hand in glove with Uncle Sam, but would non-Americans care, especially in the Middle East? I would argue that whatever influence celebrities have outside America flows in part from the fact that they are perceived as independent of Uncle Sam&#8217;s tentacles.  And that operating independently of Uncle Sam, sometimes against his policies, is a pretty powerful message to send about a vibrant, open democracy that can broadcast its societal contradictions as loudly it does its partisan shouting sprees.  Think that would fit into a DOD or DOS short-term influence peddling strategy?  </p>
<p>Careful with your &#8220;Muslim&#8221; stereotyping.  Public opinion polling in predominantly Muslim states in Africa have consistently demonstrated high favorability towards the U.S.  Muslim Senegal and Mali have among the top ten pro-American populations in the world, according to Pew.  Why is this?  Or is it easier to just to ignore them in talking about the &#8220;Muslim&#8221; world as a monolith?  It could be that there are other factors at play than religion.  It could be, too,  that two of the most influential American &#8220;celebrities&#8221; to hit West Africa in the last 50 years were Muslim, black, and had faced the wrath of Uncle Sam: Muhammed Ali and Malcolm X.  It turns out that the actors who played the Hollywood versions of their stories, Denzell Washington and Will Smith, are far more popular among Africans that out any of the American celebs who make causes of Africa.   </p>
<p>The American cultural ambassadors program of yesteryear had its bright spots, such as in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union where such celebrities as the New York Philharmonic impacted because of a shared culture.  There were also plenty of dark spots that weren&#8217;t often reflected in the USIA reporting of the era.  Take a look at Penny Von Eschen&#8217;s Satchmo Blows Up the World to read a complex and critical history of the Jazz Ambassadors, notably in Africa.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an easy answer to say Uncle Sam must always do something.  Sometimes, though, it&#8217;s the better half of wisdom not to do anything, and perhaps let our democratic culture &#8212; non-state actors &#8212;  do what they do democratically.  Muhammed Ali, silent though his voice is literally now, might have something to say about this, and believe me, if he does, that dadgum draft-dodging you-know-what will get a bigger audience that will pay closer attention out there in the Middle East and Africa than anything Washington might gear up in the name of national security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G Fisher</title>
		<link>http://comops.org/journal/2010/03/02/how-natalie-portman-and-johnny-depp-can-save-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>G Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 16:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comops.org/journal/?p=1932#comment-382</guid>
		<description>I have noticed that the US government seems to always start the public relations, publicity campaigns too late, unless it is for an election.  The military tends to stick with the simple “Press Release” and lets the opponents parse it out how they want to without rebuttal.  As a 21 year veteran, this has always bothered me.  You see, we have been talking about “Winning Hearts and Minds” since the late ‘60s, but we have yet to launch into an aggressive campaign to do that very thing.  
I would have to agree that it is very possible that the celebrities could help spread the word that Islam is not what it has been portrayed as in the media.  Also, having a true round-table, or panel, discussion including Muslims, Jews, Middle-East “experts” and celebrities that are working in the region could easily help change the pervasive perceptions about Islam.  
As a side note, I think that Natalie Portman would be the best candidate since she is Jewish and working with the Queen of an Islamic country trying to improve the lot of the poor throughout the region.  That would show that the extremists are a small minority and they are using religion to justify their actions, just like extremist groups in all religions have done in the past.
How do I sign up to attend one of these discussions?  I think it would be great to see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have noticed that the US government seems to always start the public relations, publicity campaigns too late, unless it is for an election.  The military tends to stick with the simple “Press Release” and lets the opponents parse it out how they want to without rebuttal.  As a 21 year veteran, this has always bothered me.  You see, we have been talking about “Winning Hearts and Minds” since the late ‘60s, but we have yet to launch into an aggressive campaign to do that very thing.<br />
I would have to agree that it is very possible that the celebrities could help spread the word that Islam is not what it has been portrayed as in the media.  Also, having a true round-table, or panel, discussion including Muslims, Jews, Middle-East “experts” and celebrities that are working in the region could easily help change the pervasive perceptions about Islam.<br />
As a side note, I think that Natalie Portman would be the best candidate since she is Jewish and working with the Queen of an Islamic country trying to improve the lot of the poor throughout the region.  That would show that the extremists are a small minority and they are using religion to justify their actions, just like extremist groups in all religions have done in the past.<br />
How do I sign up to attend one of these discussions?  I think it would be great to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

