<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Odd Definitions and Promising Themes in McHale&#8217;s Speech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comops.org/journal/2009/06/12/odd-definitions-and-promising-themes-in-mchales-speech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comops.org/journal/2009/06/12/odd-definitions-and-promising-themes-in-mchales-speech/</link>
	<description>A Journal of the Consortium for Strategic Communication</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:56:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: john brown</title>
		<link>http://comops.org/journal/2009/06/12/odd-definitions-and-promising-themes-in-mchales-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>john brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 22:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comops.org/journal/?p=1280#comment-241</guid>
		<description>Steve,

As always thank you for your perceptive comments.

Bottom line, though, as I see it: I think the speech was composed by a bunch of PD State Department staffers who are trying to make PD &quot;relevant&quot; at a time when &quot;engagement&quot; and &quot;smart power&quot; are much more the &quot;mots du jour&quot; in the WH. Bureaucratic committee writing at its worst.

And the staffers can&#039;t even get their grammar right, as seen in Ms. McHale&#039;s rather uninspiring rhetorical finish:

&quot;From Cairo to Kabul, from quiet villages to crowded cities, America is once again reaching out a hand of friendship and seeking new relationship. We know it is the right thing to do and we know, like [sic] General Marshall did, that our future depends on it.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>As always thank you for your perceptive comments.</p>
<p>Bottom line, though, as I see it: I think the speech was composed by a bunch of PD State Department staffers who are trying to make PD &#8220;relevant&#8221; at a time when &#8220;engagement&#8221; and &#8220;smart power&#8221; are much more the &#8220;mots du jour&#8221; in the WH. Bureaucratic committee writing at its worst.</p>
<p>And the staffers can&#8217;t even get their grammar right, as seen in Ms. McHale&#8217;s rather uninspiring rhetorical finish:</p>
<p>&#8220;From Cairo to Kabul, from quiet villages to crowded cities, America is once again reaching out a hand of friendship and seeking new relationship. We know it is the right thing to do and we know, like [sic] General Marshall did, that our future depends on it.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Murphy</title>
		<link>http://comops.org/journal/2009/06/12/odd-definitions-and-promising-themes-in-mchales-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comops.org/journal/?p=1280#comment-240</guid>
		<description>&quot;She also discussed the importance of creating a culture of risk-taking and innovation.&quot;  Probably important to consider this in terms of your work on communication as it applies to complexity theory; specifically the non-linear nature of communication and the need to continuously seek feedback and update based on that feedback.  Change in messaging and methodology should be the norm, with adherence to long-term messaging means and content either serendipitously correct, or short sighted and old-school.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;She also discussed the importance of creating a culture of risk-taking and innovation.&#8221;  Probably important to consider this in terms of your work on communication as it applies to complexity theory; specifically the non-linear nature of communication and the need to continuously seek feedback and update based on that feedback.  Change in messaging and methodology should be the norm, with adherence to long-term messaging means and content either serendipitously correct, or short sighted and old-school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

