<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Same Old Song from GAO on Strategic Communication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comops.org/journal/2009/06/03/same-old-song-from-gao-on-strategic-communication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comops.org/journal/2009/06/03/same-old-song-from-gao-on-strategic-communication/</link>
	<description>A Journal of the Consortium for Strategic Communication</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 00:02:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://comops.org/journal/2009/06/03/same-old-song-from-gao-on-strategic-communication/comment-page-1/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 13:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comops.org/journal/?p=1240#comment-238</guid>
		<description>Well said - especially the last paragraph.

Country strategic PD plans are done annually at the embassy level, and always have been in one form or another. There&#039;s plenty of planning and paperwork with lots of flow charts that comes under the label of &quot;strategic&quot;.  Imagine what could happen if the time, effort, and resources that went into these (including the  interminable Washington-centered PD reports) went instead into building human relationships in the field.  That is, Murrow&#039;s famous last &quot;three feet&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said &#8211; especially the last paragraph.</p>
<p>Country strategic PD plans are done annually at the embassy level, and always have been in one form or another. There&#8217;s plenty of planning and paperwork with lots of flow charts that comes under the label of &#8220;strategic&#8221;.  Imagine what could happen if the time, effort, and resources that went into these (including the  interminable Washington-centered PD reports) went instead into building human relationships in the field.  That is, Murrow&#8217;s famous last &#8220;three feet&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john brown</title>
		<link>http://comops.org/journal/2009/06/03/same-old-song-from-gao-on-strategic-communication/comment-page-1/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>john brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comops.org/journal/?p=1240#comment-237</guid>
		<description>Thank you for these excellent observations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for these excellent observations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Laity</title>
		<link>http://comops.org/journal/2009/06/03/same-old-song-from-gao-on-strategic-communication/comment-page-1/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Laity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 08:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comops.org/journal/?p=1240#comment-236</guid>
		<description>Agree with the thrust of the comments above. The mantra of more coordination as the answer to our problems is too often a form of politically correct displacement activity. The reality is that we have constructed such complex structures that coord is at best mitigation for a dysfunctional system, and at worst an additional massive dissipation of resources with coord almost becoming an end in itself instead of a means to an end.

As Steve implies the real issue is not organisational, but conceptual. We are still struggling to accept that we have lost control and need to engage rather than declare our views. We can&#039;t organise or resource our way out of our current problems, we need to change our attitudes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with the thrust of the comments above. The mantra of more coordination as the answer to our problems is too often a form of politically correct displacement activity. The reality is that we have constructed such complex structures that coord is at best mitigation for a dysfunctional system, and at worst an additional massive dissipation of resources with coord almost becoming an end in itself instead of a means to an end.</p>
<p>As Steve implies the real issue is not organisational, but conceptual. We are still struggling to accept that we have lost control and need to engage rather than declare our views. We can&#8217;t organise or resource our way out of our current problems, we need to change our attitudes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
