<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: State Dept. Blogging One Year Later (Part 3): What DipNote Readers Have To Say</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comops.org/journal/2008/11/20/state-dept-blogging-one-year-later-part-3-what-dipnote-readers-have-to-say/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comops.org/journal/2008/11/20/state-dept-blogging-one-year-later-part-3-what-dipnote-readers-have-to-say/</link>
	<description>A Journal of the Consortium for Strategic Communication</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:56:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internationale Diplomatie auf Twitter at viralmythen</title>
		<link>http://comops.org/journal/2008/11/20/state-dept-blogging-one-year-later-part-3-what-dipnote-readers-have-to-say/comment-page-1/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>Internationale Diplomatie auf Twitter at viralmythen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comops.org/journal/?p=708#comment-183</guid>
		<description>[...] Dreiteilige Analyse des Consortium for Strategic Communication (COMOPS) &#252;ber die Bloggingstrategie des US-Au&#223;enministeriums (Teil 1, Teil 2, Teil 3) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dreiteilige Analyse des Consortium for Strategic Communication (COMOPS) &#252;ber die Bloggingstrategie des US-Au&#223;enministeriums (Teil 1, Teil 2, Teil 3) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: COMOPS Journal &#187; State Dept. Blogging One Year Later (Part 4): State Department 2.0</title>
		<link>http://comops.org/journal/2008/11/20/state-dept-blogging-one-year-later-part-3-what-dipnote-readers-have-to-say/comment-page-1/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>COMOPS Journal &#187; State Dept. Blogging One Year Later (Part 4): State Department 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comops.org/journal/?p=708#comment-154</guid>
		<description>[...] and processes. In Part 2 we looked at what the State Department bloggers were writing about. In Part 3 we conducted an in-depth content analysis of reader comments on the blog.Â  In this post I look at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and processes. In Part 2 we looked at what the State Department bloggers were writing about. In Part 3 we conducted an in-depth content analysis of reader comments on the blog.Â  In this post I look at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren</title>
		<link>http://comops.org/journal/2008/11/20/state-dept-blogging-one-year-later-part-3-what-dipnote-readers-have-to-say/comment-page-1/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comops.org/journal/?p=708#comment-153</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the great post (and series). It is a really impressive effort and will be quite useful looking at the direction such blogs can take going forward.

In your further look at State efforts in new media, do you plan on looking at products focused on foreign audiences? DipNote is Public Affairs effort and, due to Smith-Mundt, thereby focused on the American public while the public diplomacy side (IIP/ECA) produces products, such as America.gov, directed to foreign audiences.

When it comes to social media, of note would be Blogs at America.gov (http://blogs.america.gov/) and the Exchanges social network (http://exchanges.state.gov/).

It would be great to know your thoughts on these internationally focused programs. (Full disclosure, I work for IIP on America.gov.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the great post (and series). It is a really impressive effort and will be quite useful looking at the direction such blogs can take going forward.</p>
<p>In your further look at State efforts in new media, do you plan on looking at products focused on foreign audiences? DipNote is Public Affairs effort and, due to Smith-Mundt, thereby focused on the American public while the public diplomacy side (IIP/ECA) produces products, such as America.gov, directed to foreign audiences.</p>
<p>When it comes to social media, of note would be Blogs at America.gov (<a href="http://blogs.america.gov/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.america.gov/</a>) and the Exchanges social network (<a href="http://exchanges.state.gov/" rel="nofollow">http://exchanges.state.gov/</a>).</p>
<p>It would be great to know your thoughts on these internationally focused programs. (Full disclosure, I work for IIP on America.gov.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

