<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Strategic Communication by Any Other Name</title>
	<atom:link href="http://comops.org/journal/2008/09/30/strategic-communication-by-any-other-name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://comops.org/journal/2008/09/30/strategic-communication-by-any-other-name/</link>
	<description>A Journal of the Consortium for Strategic Communication</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:58:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: COMOPS Journal &#187; Strange Annual Cycle in PD/SC Definition Debates?</title>
		<link>http://comops.org/journal/2008/09/30/strategic-communication-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>COMOPS Journal &#187; Strange Annual Cycle in PD/SC Definition Debates?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comops.org/journal/?p=473#comment-289</guid>
		<description>[...] year at about this same time we were discussing the same issue.  My contribution is here with links to the other [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] year at about this same time we were discussing the same issue.  My contribution is here with links to the other [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: COMOPS Journal &#187; New UK Primer on Strategic Communication</title>
		<link>http://comops.org/journal/2008/09/30/strategic-communication-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>COMOPS Journal &#187; New UK Primer on Strategic Communication</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comops.org/journal/?p=473#comment-165</guid>
		<description>[...] of strategic communication, the report wades into the troubled waters of defining that term: In the US, strategic communication is often regarded as being 80% actions [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of strategic communication, the report wades into the troubled waters of defining that term: In the US, strategic communication is often regarded as being 80% actions [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: COMOPS Journal &#187; Strategic Communication vs. Public Diplomacy vs. Dialogue</title>
		<link>http://comops.org/journal/2008/09/30/strategic-communication-by-any-other-name/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>COMOPS Journal &#187; Strategic Communication vs. Public Diplomacy vs. Dialogue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 00:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://comops.org/journal/?p=473#comment-137</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;subset&#8221; any more than PD is simply about &#8220;message.&#8221; Â If anything, it is the other way around:Â  PD is better conceived as a subset of SC because PD activities are but one theater of SC [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;subset&#8221; any more than PD is simply about &#8220;message.&#8221; Â If anything, it is the other way around:Â  PD is better conceived as a subset of SC because PD activities are but one theater of SC [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
